Eclipse Platform Project Draft 3. Plan. Last revised 9: 0. EST September 1. 1, 2. May 9, 2. 00. 6). Please send comments about this draft plan to theeclipse- dev@eclipse. This document lays out the feature and API set for the next feature release. JSR # Name Description; 68: J2ME Platform Specification: 30: CLDC 1.x: 37: MIDP 1.0: 118: MIDP 2.x: 139: CLDC 1.1: 271: MIDP 3.0: Java ME 3.4 and earlier only, Last Specification for Mobile Phones, Java Language features as. Developer: Accenture on behalf of Nokia (historically Symbian Ltd. Ebook List: Mcgraw Hill 10 Immutable Laws Of Power Selling.chm Mcgraw Hill 1001 Ways To Save Money And Still Have A Dazzling Wedding 2002.pdf Mcgraw Hill 201 Best Questions To Ask On Your Interview.pdf Mcgraw Hill 201 Killer. Eclipse SDK after 3. To ensure. the planning process is transparent and open to the entire Eclipse community. Eclipse Project PMC) post plans in an embryonic form and revise them. These are all things that need to be clear for. Each plan item covers a feature or API. Eclipse Project deliverables, or some aspect of the Eclipse Project. J2ME: Step by step Presented by developerWorks, your source for great tutorials ibm.com/developerWorks Table of Contents If you're viewing this document online, you can click any of the topics below to link directly to that. When Samsung released the Samsung 750 EVO series SSD some time back everyone was skeptical about the product as samsung. Each plan item has its own entry in the Eclipse bugzilla. Some plan items may involve work that is localized. SDK. Although some plan. Fixing bugs, improving test coverage. The intent of the plan is to account for all interesting feature work. Although we are actively. After due consideration, a proposal. Deferred plan item - A reasonable proposal that will not make it in. Deferred plan items may resurface as committed plan. Release deliverables. The release deliverables have the same form as previous releases, namely. Source code release for all Eclipse Project deliverables, available as versions. The milestones are. Friday Aug. 1. 2, 2. Milestone 1 (3. 2 M1) - stable build Friday Sep. Milestone 2 (3. 2 M2) - stable build Friday Nov. Milestone 3 (3. 2 M3) - stable build Friday Dec. Milestone 4 (3. 2 M4) - stable build Friday Feb. Milestone 5 (3. 2 M5) - stable build - API complete - API freeze Friday Mar. Milestone 6 (3. 2 M6) - stable build - feature complete - development. Our target is to complete 3. June 2. 00. 6. All release deliverables will be available. The chief dependence is. Java Platform itself. Portions of the Eclipse SDK. RCP base, SWT, OSGi and JDT core plug- ins) are targeted. J2. ME Foundation 1. J2. SE 1. 3 and 1. We focus Eclipse SDK testing on a handful. The Eclipse SDK 3. Eclipse Reference Platforms. Operating system. OS version. Processor architecture. Window system. Java 2 Platform. Microsoft Windows. XPIntel x. 86. Win. Sun Java 2 Standard Edition 5. Update 6for Microsoft Windows. Microsoft Windows. XPIntel x. 86. Win. IBM 3. 2- bit SDK for Windows,Java 2 Technology Edition 5. Microsoft Windows. XPIntel x. 86. Win. BEA JRockit 5. 0 R2. Microsoft Windows. Microsoft Windows. XPIntel x. 86. Win. Sun Java 2 Standard Edition 1. Of course, the teams doing Java 5 based. Java 5 platforms, and the specific ones that they test on. We expect that Eclipse will work fine on other Java 5 VMs. SWT, but can not flag these as reference. Similarly, although untested, the Eclipse SDK should work fine on other OSes that. For Win. 32: Windows 9. ME, NT, 2. 00. 0, and Server. SWT HTML viewer requires Internet Explorer 5 (or higher). For GTK on other. Linux systems: version 2. GTK+ widget toolkit and associated libraries. GLib, Pango); SWT HTML viewer requires Mozilla 1. GTK2. For Motif on. Linux systems: Open Motif 2. SWT HTML viewer requires Mozilla 1. GTK2. Testing has been limited to early access 6. J2. SEs running on. SWT is also supported on the QNX Neutrino operating system, x. Photon window system, and IBM J9 VM version 2. Eclipse 3. 2 on Windows or Linux. QNX applications. The English strings are provided. Latin- 1 locales are supported by the Eclipse SDK on all of the above. DBCS locales are supported by the Eclipse SDK. Windows, GTK, and Motif window systems; BIDI locales are supported by. Eclipse SDK only on Windows operating environments. The Eclipse SDK supports GB 1. Chinese code page. Windows XP and 2. Linux/GTK. German and Japanese locales are tested. BIDI support. SWT fully supports BIDI on Windows. On Linux GTK, SWT supports entering. BIDI text. Within these limitations, the Eclipse. SDK tools are BIDI enabled. Compatibility with Previous Releases. Compatibility of Release 3. Eclipse 3. 2 will be compatible with Eclipse 3. API Contract Compatibility: Eclipse SDK 3. Eclipse SDK 3. 1 except in those areas noted in the Eclipse. Plug- in Migration Guide. Programs that use affected APIs and extension. Eclipse SDK 3. 2 APIs. Downward contract compatibility. There is no guarantee that compliance with Eclipse SDK 3. APIs would ensure compliance with Eclipse SDK 3. APIs. Refer to Evolving. Java- based APIs for a discussion of the kinds of API changes that maintain. Binary (plug- in) Compatibility: Eclipse SDK 3. Eclipse SDK 3. 1 except in those areas noted in the Eclipse. Plug- in Migration Guide. Downward plug- in compatibility is not. Plug- ins for Eclipse SDK 3. Eclipse SDK 3. 1. This means that source files written to. Eclipse SDK 3. 1 APIs might successfully compile and run against Eclipse. SDK 3. 2 APIs, although this is not guaranteed. Downward source compatibility. If source files use new Eclipse SDK APIs, they will not be. Eclipse SDK. This means that workspaces and projects created. Eclipse SDK 3. 1 or 3. Eclipse SDK 3. 2 and. This includes both hidden metadata, which is localized. Individual plug- ins developed for Eclipse. SDK 3. 2 should provide similar upwards compatibility for their hidden and visible. User interface session state may be discarded when. Downward workspace compatibility is not supported. Visible metadata files created. Eclipse 3. 2 will generally be unusable with earlier versions. Eclipse. Client plug- ins that directly depend. Eclipse SDK API are inherently. Refer to How. to Use the Eclipse API for information about how to write compliant. Increasing. complexities arise from large development teams distributed in different locations. Enterprise Ready - Eclipse should be improved to allow. Design for Extensibility: Be a Better Platform - Within. Eclipse community, many development projects are defining new development. Eclipse Project deliverables. These must evolve. APIs to expose. existing functionality only available internally so that upper platforms can. Simple to Use - . The Eclipse components need to not only provide the features that advanced users demand. Rich Client Platform - . The Eclipse RCP is a Java- based application framework for the desktop. Building on the. Eclipse runtime and the modular plug- in story, it is possible to build applications ranging from. SWT's native. platform integration and the many other reusable components. Appealing to the Broader Community - . This theme includes work that grows deeper roots into the various OS- specific communities. Eclipse to additional operating environments, virtual machines, application. Each of the four projects under the top- level Eclipse Project is covered. For each project, the items listed reflect new features of Eclipse or areas. Each item indicates. Numbers in parentheses link to bugzilla problem. Plan. items reflect new features of the Eclipse Platform, or areas where existing. The Eclipse Platform. However, there are many situations where plug- in. Eclipse should ease the task for plug- in developers who want. To do this, Eclipse should provide more. This would, for example. In addition, existing views like the navigator and problems view. Currently in Eclipse there. IResources and files and directories on the. Eclipse should loosen this connection, by abstracting out. File, and allowing for alternative implementations. Modern UI design. SWT should provide the tools needed to implement. For example: sort indicators in SWT tables; improved. SWT's basis in native. Eclipse's major strengths. For this to remain true, SWT. For the 3. 2 release, SWT should. Windows Vista. The Eclipse Text component provides. Java editor. The Java. Another enhancement to the. Other possible enhancements include improving the Find/Replace dialog. Eclipse has numerous. Eclipse should provide an enhanced. The debug support in Eclipse is. Java programs. Features will be provided as. API subject to change in a future release. Features include: a. Similarly, end users expect to be able to customize the UI. Eclipse should enable both products and. For example. the workbench layout should be made more flexible and configurable, and. The UI component has. UIs tailored to the user's role. In some. situations, users have workspaces containing hundreds of projects and hundreds. Scoped builds and working sets have become important. Eclipse 3. 1. have proven helpful. Eclipse should have even more support for dealing with. This goes hand- in- hand with ongoing work to discover and address. As the number and range of Eclipse. For instance, if more information about an Eclipse install. Enhance the existing Help System functionality in. Help documentation, documentation index, more extensible dynamic. The Eclipse cheat sheet. For cheat. sheets to be become more widely adopted, the base support should be enhanced. Java programming; make cheat sheets more scalable; providing for. Although. the representation is simple and reliable, it is difficult to tailor the content. The representation for help content. Also, branding information should be separated from the. These features also apply to Welcome, Cheat. Sheets and the dynamic help. In the increasingly componentized environment. Based on experience gained in. Welcome implementations so far, a universal Welcome implementation. Universal. Welcome will be customizable by both products and users, and will. A selected. number of root pages that can cover the needs of most products will. ICU4. J. (http: //icu. Java, and. thus adopting ICU4. J will provide the Eclipse Platform with the strong. Eclipse- based applications. The first goal of this work is to make any required porting. Various problems are encountered. For example. the current compare infrastructure requires creating a separate text editor. This is due to a limitation in the workbench. The UI component model should be improved to support nesting of workbench. UI configurations. UI Forms are increasingly being used in. Eclipse user interface. The UI Form support should be improved to allow. Critical widget functionality should be moved. SWT to ensure quality and native look and feel. The remaining UI Forms. Form. Editor) should be pushed down into JFace so that it is available. Eclipse workbench. These vehicles use similar concepts but have separate/duplicate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |